Banking & insurance · AI for tenders

Compare the offers. Justify each choice.

IT services, outsourcing, document management, or claims management services: compare the offers received using a single common grid. Specgen produces analyses and proposed scores, with their sources, to support the decision-making of your procurement and business teams.

Procurement, business, IT, risk, and compliance departments · Banks and insurance companies

One criterion, three offers, sources
Procurement matrix · Reversibility
Scope and conditions for returning the expected data.
Offers A, B and C
Responses presented in different sections.
A single comparison baseline

The selected criterion is applied to all three offers.

1 / 3

Explanatory diagram · Fictional example, with no customer data.

100% extracted and classified requirements
75% task automation related to tenders
Your data within your infrastructure · On-Premise / Air-Gapped
Your challenges, practical use cases

A solution tailored to the way you work.

1 · Review

A common grid

Candidates respond in different structures, with varying levels of detail.

Align the offers with your criteria and obtain an analysis by criterion, then a comparative summary.
2 · Clarifications

Items to complete

A response on reversibility, service commitments, or the continuity arrangements must be reviewed.

Identify non-localized responses and prepare follow-up questions for your discussions with the candidates.
3 · Collective decision

Well-founded assessments

Procurement, business teams, and control functions must be able to review the elements that support the comparison.

Access the excerpts from the offers, review the proposed scores, and keep a record of your assessments and decisions.
4 · Confidentiality

Data under control

The consultations and offers received contain sensitive commercial and operational information.

Analyze the documents within your infrastructure, with access rights and local processing.
Offer comparison · Buyer side

A comparison your teams can explain.

The criterion-by-criterion analysis and the proposed scores are linked to the elements available in the offers. Teams can review the justifications, prepare clarifications, and keep a record of their decisions.

DOCUMENT REVIEW EXAMPLE
Offer A · Reversibility To review Offer A §8 · Terms described
Offer B · Reversibility To be clarified Unlocalized response
Offer C · Reversibility To be completed Offer C §6 · Partial detail
Fictional example · The AI’s assessments are subject to review by your teams. The final decision remains human.
Deployment & data governance

Your tendering AI.
In your environment.

Discovery on servers in France
Non-sensitive files
3 months to assess usage
An opportunity for discovery for files suited to this framework, before a local rollout.
On-Premise
Models and processing on your servers
Control of your data
Analysis, research, drafting and review within your infrastructure, with no external AI API or outbound data flow.
Air-Gapped
Isolated network, with no Internet connection
Fully local operation
Processing runs within your perimeter. Updates are provided in packages validated by your teams.

A three-month discovery is also possible On-Premise or Air-Gapped , after installation in your environment. Operation without an outbound connection can then be evaluated with your technical teams.

The value for your teams

More time for expertise and decision-making.

1 Speed up the review

Compare responses using a common grid despite different document structures.

2 Prepare targeted clarifications

Support candidate discussions with the documentary points that still need to be clarified.

3 Support the committee’s decision

Make the assessments, the proposed scores, and their sources available to the evaluators.

Questions to review for your project.

Our evaluators must retain control over the scores.

AI suggests scores and well-founded assessments. Evaluators review them and remain responsible for the final decision.

Is hosting enough to meet our obligations?

Local processing helps maintain control of data. Your organization’s requirements and the applicable obligations still need to be reviewed by your competent functions.

Your next call for tenders

Let’s shed light on your next comparison.

Let’s discuss your use cases with the people involved in your project. A one-hour video demo, with no prior preparation.

Request a demo

An old file can be used as supporting material under an NDA. The AI results are presented back to you on a timeline agreed based on the teams’ availability.

Frequently asked questions · Banking & insurance

The answers to move forward.

How does Specgen compare multiple supplier bids?

Bids are analyzed using the same criteria grid. Specgen produces an analysis by criterion and a comparative summary, with the source excerpts available.

Does the AI assign scores?

Yes, Specgen provides scores and assessments. They are reviewed by your evaluators; the final award decision remains human.

Does Specgen send questions to bidders?

No. Specgen helps prepare and track follow-up questions. Sending them is handled by your team as part of your consultation process.

Does an unlocated response mean that the bidder did not respond?

Not necessarily. This status indicates that a response was not located by the analysis. Your evaluators review the offer and request clarification if necessary.

What use cases for an insurance company?

Procurement teams can compare offers from IT service providers, document management providers, or claims management services, based on their criteria and the documents received.

Can we try Specgen for three months on our infrastructure?

Yes. The three-month discovery can be carried out On-Premise or Air-Gapped, after installation in your environment. Discovery on servers in France is also possible for non-sensitive cases suited to this framework.

How can we verify the sources of the AI’s results?

Requirements, drafted passages, and assessments are linked to their documentary sources. Specgen flags insufficient information; your teams review the supporting evidence and validate the results.